<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.skipbx.com">
<channel>
 <title>Mobiles reviews - judgment</title>
 <link>http://www.skipbx.com/taxonomy/term/1212/0</link>
 <description>Auto generated by aggregator2 autotaxonomy</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Court saves Qualcomm from paying doubled compensatory damages to Broadcom - $19.6 million in damages</title>
 <link>http://www.skipbx.com/court_saves_qualcomm_from_paying_doubled_compensatory_damages_to_broadcom_19_6_million_in_damages.html</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In a moment of bittersweet victory for Qualcomm, a federal judge upheld U.S. District Court Judge James V. Selna’s previous ruling that Qualcomm is indeed guilty of infringing on  Broadcom’s 3G WCDMA technology . However, and here’s the sweet part, the ruling overturned Judge Selna’s decision to double the damages awarded to Broadcom by a federal jury.    Earlier this year, the federal jury had unanimously found that Qualcomm was guilty of infringing on Broadcom’s patents. The jury further found that Qualcomm’s actions were willful, which allowed Selna to double the $19.6 million  damage amount to $39.3 million.  Broadcom was offered another the option to seek a new trial in which the willfulness of Qualcomm’s actions would be tried again, but the Irvine, CA.-based chipmaker has decided to accept $19.6 million in compensatory damages.    So, Qualcomm ended up saving a good chunk of change. Unfortunately, they’re still going to have to cough up a sizable fortune to Broadcom. At least they’ve had a bit of good luck in getting  those other   cases dismissed .    [Via:  EETimes ]   ---Related Articles at IntoMobile:Broadcom snags $19.6M payment from Qualcomm over Patent DisputeNokia fires back at Qualcomm; Files Counter-suitNokia files another counter-suit against QualcommBroadcom wins appeal for 2005 anti-trust lawsuit against QualcommBroadcom Sues Qualcomm Over Patent And Licensing Mis-steps&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IntoMobile">Into Mobile</source>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/announcements">announcements</category>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/broadcom">broadcom</category>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/chip">chip</category>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/infringement">infringement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/judgment">judgment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/lawsuit">lawsuit</category>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/patent">patent</category>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/qualcomm">qualcomm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.skipbx.com/feed/technologies">technologies</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
